Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 621 - 640
of 25,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
On June 22, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in three cases addressing the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act: People v King, No. 142850, People v Kolanek, No. 142695, People v Kolanek, No. 142712. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:57 am
As I explained in Part 1 of this series, this was a bit of judicial sleight of hand. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
V. versa. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 9:58 am
This is when people come to Child custody lawyers like me for help requesting a modification. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
In Wickard v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
Shack and Jacques v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:37 am
The Court of Appeals orders a new trial for two people accused of marriage fraud because the trial judge had an ex parte conversation with the jurors and may have compromised the integrity of the jury process by undermining the presumption of innocence.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 12:48 pm
I suspect, moreover, that a large part of what caused him to lose it is being locked up in the first place. [read post]
3 May 2021, 2:16 pm
Whereas, thankfully, in a "normal" opinion you get a lot more synthesis of these analytical parts. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 1:44 pm
A trial judge's error isn't okay just because it was said in response to an erroneous conclusion of law by a guy deciding whether to try to defend himself.Ditto for Justice Aaron's discussion of the trial judge's misstatement about the deadly weapon part; i.e., "Fox: They're not alleging a deadly weapon. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:33 pm
Nor do I suspect that we need to deter the type of conduct that transpired here, because I strongly suspect that most defendants know that what went down here was in no small part the reason the guy to a decade-plus in prison. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
Terrible.The next part of the opinion's factual recitation is the one that got me wondering whether my mental impression of Marco's age was totally off:"Immediately after climbing through Lujano’s window, Marco went inside his own house and told his mother what had happened—that he “got raped. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:07 pm
In Eramo v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
In People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:07 pm
In Eramo v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
v=yi0lkJBTi58Share | [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 am
In People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 9:22 am
From today's decision in State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
Cross-posted from SCOTUS Blog, where this essay is part of its special Black History Month coverage:In May 1954, Brown v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm
For an in-depth discussion on the first order, please see my two-part series on Lawfare ((Part I and Part II) ) and my forthcoming essay in the Texas Law Review See Also, titled The 9th Circuit’s Contrived Comedy of Errors in Washington v. [read post]
