Search for: "People v. Profit" Results 621 - 640 of 4,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2008, 5:04 pm by Litwak
The state argues that the "grossly repugnant" video games are not worthy of First Amendment protection because they do not communicate or express ideas or information.For more information, please see: Entertainment Software Association et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:44 am by Joe Mullin
The people who profit from lawsuits over these patents, and hide their identities while doing so, are long overdue for this type of investigation. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:27 am by Eugene Volokh
“[W]hat defines commercial speech” is that the speech “proposes a commercial transaction,” not that some of the people who engage in the speech are motivated by profit. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
Counsel responded that Zoo management can determines rules and requirements for people entering the property. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:04 am by Tiffany Blofield
  There was a big “bad” company that was feeding its cows oil pellets (somehow resulting in more profits). [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:47 am by Administrator
Manitoba Metis Federation Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:42 am
Senator McCain added '[a] company that found remarkable success by harnessing American ingenuity and the opportunities afforded by the U.S. economy should not be shifting its profits overseas to avoid the payment of U.S. tax, purposefully depriving the American people of revenue' (statement here). [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:56 am
" This makes it even more ridiculous that corporations would hem and haw over the law, and only goes to show that tort "reform" is only about protecting corporations from having to pay for putting profits ahead of people. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 8:28 pm by Richard Hunt
What is really incredible is that lawyers and clients like this continue to exploit the ADA for profit. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:45 am
  Before these people died in 2017, they were among the 34,000 people housed in Arizona’s state prisons who are completely dependent upon the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC) and its for-profit contractor, Corizon Health, for all medical and mental health care. [read post]