Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,947
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
V. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:19 am
A sample, from Washington v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:47 am
As a way to test how useful this would be, I’m adding a partial sample jurisdiction browse list below. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 12:23 am
Dissenting again in Lee v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 5:39 am
So who cares about people accused of drunk driving and their constitutional rights? [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 9:20 pm
Hustler v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 8:13 pm
Real people – they were your customers. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:53 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 10:33 pm
One, in Gonzales v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 1:48 pm
Most people do not refuse a chemical test because there are penalties for refusing testing after a lawful DUI arrest. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am
ACLU says California DNA law violates privacy [San Francisco Chronicle] Haskell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
People will pay if they have enough money. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:27 am
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
” In 1972, in Apodaca v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 9:25 am
As the 'largest sex survey ever done in Australia', and with an impressive sample size of 19,307 randomly-sampled men and women, this research is an excellent contribution towards understandings of sexual practices and sexual health in twenty-first century Australia.In 18 small and easily digestible chapters, the book covers the basics of what people do sexually and how often, sexual attitudes, masturbation, using sex toys and pornography, cheating and… [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:38 pm
Latest Analyis: Scalia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 11:40 am
In the case at hand, State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
California and United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:49 am
It was the Supreme Court’s decision in Harper v. [read post]
