Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Persons)"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Zobel, who served on the Massachusetts Superior Court and who had assembled a remarkable collection of Holmes materials over decades of research into the justice’s judicial career — I was able to be the first biographer of Holmes to make a thorough examination of Holmes’ experiences as a trial judge. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm
Demeanour evidence was most thoroughly evaluated in recent years in the Supreme Court of Canada case of R. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:56 pm
The People of the State of California v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
For instance, in Qualcomm v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
The tort of harassment was recognized in the 2017 Ontario Superior Court case Merrifield v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 3:42 am
Decision in Magno v Balita On 23 May 2018 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released a decision involving a claim for internet defamation Magno v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Fellowship Program, Aspen Tech Policy Hub At the Aspen Tech Policy Hub, we take tech experts, teach them the policy process through an in-person fellowship program in the Bay Area, and encourage them to develop outside-the-box solutions to society’s problems. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
Their judgments of conviction were sustained by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, which rejected the argument that the ordinance deprived them of the freedom of speech, press, and religion guaranteed by the First Amendment. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
Human Rights First is committed to recruiting, retaining, and developing staff from a diversity of backgrounds, including members of racial and ethnic minorities, LGBT people, people with disabilities, people of all socioeconomic backgrounds, people of all nationalities, and veterans of the U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 8:52 am
However, Russell Alexander posted some comments yesterday on the recent decision in Kirby v Kirby that has given me pause for thought. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
Human Rights First is committed to recruiting, retaining, and developing staff from a diversity of backgrounds, including members of racial and ethnic minorities, LGBT people, people with disabilities, people of all socioeconomic backgrounds, people of all nationalities, and veterans of the U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:46 am
A challenge to the provisions was successful in the Ontario Superior Court; however, that decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:01 am
I'd love to hear what people think. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 2:23 pm
(the “Northern California Pipe Trades action”), filed in San Mateo County Superior Court on January 9, 2019, can be found here. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
The Superior Court motion decision, summarized on Slaw here, relied on the Arbitration Act, 1991, the International Commercial Arbitration Act, 2017, and case law such as Seidel v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am
Article 37 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) expressly prohibits such influence from any “person subject to this chapter,” and neither courts nor Congress have determined that a president is a “member of the regular component of the armed forces” and thus subject to the UCMJ. [read post]
