Search for: "People v. Wood"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
It is true that if a large employer, such as Hobby Lobby or Conestoga Wood, drops its health insurance plan, a provision of the ACA, 26 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
” Many people receive such services through Medicare, or Medicaid, or by purchasing a plan (often with substantial government subsidies) on a government-run “exchange. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:25 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 9:40 pm
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialty Store v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm
(Indeed, you are required by law to get it—or perhaps not exactly required, see NFIB v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:10 pm
The case is discussed here for informational purposes only.Woods v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:33 am
” And at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Jonathan Wood discusses yesterday’s denial of review in Martin v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:49 am
At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost weighs in on last week’s oral arguments in Town of Greece v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Gawker and Sheldon v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court absolutely got it right in Employment Div. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/l2MXeuR5q1 -> Newbury v Sun Microsystems Ltd – when is a settlement offer binding? [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:33 pm
Carey v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 7:17 am
A search engine is good to answer a question like, “How many people live in China? [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:43 am
When Allensworth pointed to Van Dusen v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 1:30 pm
Hundreds of people lost their lives in just over a month of fighting in 1862. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:03 am
Hundreds of people lost their lives in just over a month of fighting in 1862. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
” The circuit judges followed with a ruling two weeks ago in the securities fraud case of United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am
See also Hart, 717 F.3d at 155 (“‘a Lanham Act false endorsement claim is the federal equivalent of the right of publicity’”, taken from the Tiger Woods right of publicity case, ETW Corp. v. [read post]