Search for: "Periodical Advertisers" Results 621 - 640 of 7,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2023, 6:24 am by Phyllis H. Marcus
The FTC has announced that it is extending by 60 days (from February 21 to April 24, 2023) the public comment period on potential updates to the agency’s “Green Guides. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:47 pm by Penny Biram
During the periods of May 2014 and December 2015 the insured’s credit card system was breached by hackers who obtained unauthorised access to customers’ information from their Visa, MasterCard, and the bank (point-of-sale-system service providers) which issued the customers’ credit cards. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  In the European Union, the recently updated Code of Practice on Disinformation now covers deepfakes and will require platforms to conduct periodic reviews of disinformation tactics used by malicious actors, also mandating the implementation of policies to cover those practices. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm by Mindy Harris
The FDIC has announced that it is extending by 45 days the comment period for proposed changes to its signage and advertising rule. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 7:11 am by David Oxenford and Robert Primosch
  Broadcasters should consult with counsel before running CBD advertising that makes health-related claims, or ads for ingestible CBD products. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 11:00 pm by Gonzalo E. Mon
Even if the company could support the claims most of the time, the FTC argued that the change in the supply chain rendered claims during that ten-month period misleading. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:51 pm by David Klein
Approximately 70,000 consumers complained that they were unfairly billed anywhere from $29.99 to $79.99 every month following a trial period. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:22 pm by Levin Papantonio
”Although hundreds of millions of dollars have been put into advertising in Camp Lejeune cases, the market is not saturated, Barr explained. [read post]
The proposed arrangement would not be advertised in magazines, journals, digital ads, or other mass consumption forums. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 8:13 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
  It must also be reasonable in its scope, usually geographic, and the time period in which it would be in force. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am by Cyberleagle
If anything graphically illustrates the perilous waters into which we venture when we require online intermediaries to pass judgment on the legality of user-generated content, it is the government’s decision to add S.24 of the Immigration Act 1971 to the Online Safety Bill’s list of “priority illegal content”: user content that platforms must detect and remove proactively, not just by reacting to notifications. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:02 am by Berniard Law Firm
Claims brought under LPLA have a one-year prescriptive period; the period begins from the day the injury occurs or when damage is sustained. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 7:21 pm by Chris Dreyer
And while you shouldn’t change your strategy very frequently, we recommend you revisit periodically to see if what was true about the world in the past is still true today. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 8:05 am by Andrew D. Kasnevich
The court found that these characteristics met the New York standard for “clear and conspicuous” Terms of Use.6 In addition, the court rejected the account holders’ arguments that Celsius modified the Terms of Use through advertisements, media uploaded to its website, social media, and by the oral statements of its CEO, finding statements like these are not offers, and an offer is a necessary predicate for any “amendment” to the Terms of Use.7 The court… [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:07 pm by INFORRM
They would have a limited period such as three months to take possession. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 6:00 am by patrickdaniellaw
A consumer trusts that the product they purchase will work as advertised, last for the stated period of time, and be safe to use. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Google recently moved for summary judgment in the case brought against it by the DOJ and a coalition of state attorneys general alleging that Google has maintained monopolies in general search services, search advertising and general search text advertising. [read post]