Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 621 - 640 of 5,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2015, 3:00 pm by Sophia Cope
Citing the Supreme Court case Bantam Books, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:02 am
Schwebel, The outlook for the continued vitality, or lack thereof, of investor–State arbitration Francisco González de Cossío, Enforcement of annulled awards: towards a better analytical approach Berk Demirkol, Interpretation of the dispute settlement clause in Turkish investment treaties with Turkic States Kateryna Bondar, Allocation of costs in investor-State and commercial arbitration: towards a harmonized approach Stephanie Mullen & Elizabeth Whitsitt, Quantum,… [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:05 am by Amy Howe
Thomas did, however, dissent today from the denial of review in two cases, Upstate Citizens v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 1:53 pm by N. Scott Pierce
Despite potentially relevant Supreme Court precedent in Thomas and Granfinanciera, the better view under the weight of Supreme Court precedent with respect to patent validity, absent the recent decision by the Court in Oil States, is that determination of the validity of issued patents does not include the government as a party and, therefore, only private rights are involved. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 7:03 am
Thomas University School of Law) has posted Citizenship, Civic Virtue and Immigrant Integration: The Enduring Power of Community-Based Norms (Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 27, pp. 335-397, Spring 2009) on SSRN. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:37 am by Bill Otis
  Here is one excerpt of his analysis: In United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 10:32 am by James Hamilton
In remarksat recent E.U. conference, he noted that the legal basis for deriving implied powers from the penumbra of other express powers is best seen in the opinion of Justice Douglas in Griswold v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 3:21 am by Aimee Denholm
Handing down the judgment, the Lord Chief Justice (Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd) , Master of the Rolls (Sir Terence Etherton) and Lord Justice Sales, have found that the Government is not entitled to give notice of a decision to leave the EU under Article 50 by exercise of the prerogative powers of the Crown and without reference to Parliament. [read post]