Search for: "Principle Long Term Care, Inc."
Results 621 - 640
of 656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Additionally, it would be useful to examine consumer demand in different types of markets (e.g., chain restaurants, institutional settings such hospitals, long-term care facilities, and prisons). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
The Supreme Court defended its conclusion on thebasis of general principles concerning statutoryconstruction:Our conclusion is confirmed when we consider AEDPA'spurposes. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
Yuba Power Products, Inc., explained the rationale for what it called "strict liability":We need not recanvass the reasons for imposing strict liability on the manufacturer. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 11:15 pm
Renegotiating our NAFTA agreement with the U.S., and perhaps even clarifying our role in NATO, might actually be in our best long-term interests. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
Such disclosure will not waive the privilege as long as the holder takes reasonable steps to prevent disclosure and acts promptly to retrieve the inadvertently disclosed documents. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 6:07 pm
Footnote 99 observed that the shareholders were NOT given a Hobson's Choice of selling the company or going into bankruptcy, as the company was viable with good long term prospects. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 1:38 am
Long-Term and Permanent Injury Although a minority of botulism patients eventually recover their pre-infection health, the majority do not. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
Applying these principles to the instant case, we conclude that the BAPCPA is a constitutionally uniform law. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 2:43 am
The long answer (zzzzzz) is a bit more nuanced. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 1:43 am
The long answer (zzzzzz) is a bit more nuanced. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 14, 2008 Stroman Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
When Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:41 am
DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc., 702 A.2d 1228, 1232 (Del.1997) ("If a contract is unambiguous, extrinsic evidence may not be used to interpret the intent of the parties, to vary the terms of the contract or to create an ambiguity. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 2006 WL 2819046, at *9 (D.N.J. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
For all intents and purposes Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
1. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
There are more cases on this point than we care to think about, but here are a few: Lamie v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Asbestos Workers Local 84 (DST Insulation, Inc [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
Can-Am Plumbing, Inc. (32-CA-16097; 350 NLRB No. 75) Pleasanton, CA Aug. 24, 2007. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:20 am
The court said the guidelines "deserve careful consideration in each case. [read post]
