Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice" Results 621 - 640 of 1,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2024, 1:38 pm by Jeff Welty
Raymond argues that the ultimate burden of these policies fell most heavily on low-income Black and brown citizens, and that they ultimately undermined public safety because they pulled young people unnecessarily into the criminal justice system. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:03 pm by Joshua Sellers
With this decision, Justice Alito, writing for the six conservative Justices, further weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA). [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:00 am by Steve Vladeck
This may seem thin as an explanation for why the government would bring such a small-time case, but I’m at a loss for other arguments as to why the Justice Department would expend the resources this case has consumed if there weren’t bigger (hypothetical future) fish to fry. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm by JURIST Staff
Additionally, the Lahore High Court has taken proactive measures by imposing restrictions on market hours and curtailing public gatherings to protect citizens’ health during severe smog episodes. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:18 pm by Nate Cardozo and Sophia Cope
The Commerce Department withdrew its 2015 proposed rules to implement the agreement after much public opposition, led in part by EFF. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:07 am by James Bickford
Jaclyn Frankfurt of the Public Defender Service, counsel for Robertson, began by arguing that Watson was bringing charges as a private citizen, in violation of the Constitution. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
The court’s description of the facts and developments below goes on to explain that onor around June 4, 2014, Doe was arrested in connection with a fraud investigation conducted by the Nevada DMV and the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Selmont, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:55 am by Aaron Rubin
” The social media posts, therefore, did not meet the threshold requirement established by Pickering v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 4:18 pm
Finally, the court noted that a "more recent" pronouncement by the Department of Justice reached the contrary conclusion. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
Justice Thomas’s statement, while the voice of only one Supreme Court justice, is especially concerning in light of President Trump’s aspiration to “open up the libel laws,” which seems to be aimed at overruling Sullivan. [read post]