Search for: "Public Service Company v. Brown" Results 621 - 640 of 812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
I’m then joined by my colleague Professor Jeremy DeBeer to discuss the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision on Keatley Surveying v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Narintohn Luangrath
Racialized myths about Black and Brown workers drove meatpacking companies’ disregard for worker safety during the pandemic, Sherley E. [read post]
AB 817 would carve out an exception to Labor Code section 226.7’s off-duty “rest period” requirement for employers providing emergency medical services to the public. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog)   Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars)   Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos… [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm by R Grace Rodriguez
They “executed a Deed of Trust in favor of CTX MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC, which is the company that held the mortgage on this home, which Deed of Trust was recorded” on or about November 28, 2007. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Starting on the rail is AEP Energy Services v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by ACLU
Despite an executive order ending contracts with private prison companies, these persist through “work-around” third-party agreements. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 11:56 pm
Wey alleged that Thain breached his fiduciary duty by concealing the exchange's pending transformation into a public company. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am by INFORRM
  There is a news story about the case on the Courthouse News Service site. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The Malaysian politician, Hadi Awang, has discontinued his libel action (see Lawtel [£]) against Clare Rewcastle Brown over a post in the “Sarawak Report”. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:01 am
In Brand X, the high court upheld a previous FCC ruling that said cable companies provide an "information service" rather than a "telecommunications service" and therefore should not be forced to share their infrastructure with ISPs. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
As a result, the retroactivity provision did not become effective until August 1, 2008 —30 days after its publication in the final SMART guidelines along with the Attorney General’s response to related public comments. [read post]