Search for: "Quick v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 5,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2011, 9:50 am by Bill Callison
  A very quick review of several state LLC acts reveals that different states have different (or no) formulations for derivative claims. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm by Jane Chong
Section V: Retention An IC element may retain raw SIGINT for up to five years “after the information is first collected by NSA,” unless continued retention (for up to another five years) is approved in writing by the IC head. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:08 am
Readers might remember the case of LB Harrow v Ibrahim and another [2008] EWCA Civ 386 (noted by us here) where the Court of Appeal referred three questions to the ECJ concerning the rights of residents of family members of former Community workers. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:52 am
David Quick is a patent attorney with Ice Miller LLP focusing his efforts on patent prosecution and general intellectual property matters.Verizon v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
Many readers of this blog may be members of the settlement class in the BAR/BRI antitrust case, Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:31 am by Will Baude
On a quick reflection, it seems likely to me that this language was understood to give power to the legislatures of the states, acting pursuant to their (state) constitutional procedures. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court, taking quick action on two states’ constitutional challenge to Colorado’s new marijuana sales policy, asked the federal government on Monday for its reaction to that case (144 Original, Nebraska and Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:36 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in  Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States on a good-faith exception to exclusion for a change in case law, and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd on qualified immunity from civil suit. [read post]