Search for: "RECORD v. RECORD" Results 621 - 640 of 71,985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm by Stacey Lantagne
I just blogged about a case in which failure to keep proper records meant there wasn't enough proof of agreement to the arbitration clause, and here's another one out of Texas, Stagg Restaurants, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:30 am by Gene Quinn
Since that time I have worked to schedule a time to chat with him on the record, and we were recently able to coordinate and chatted on the record for approximately 60 minutes. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Inc. v New York State Dept. of Audit & Control, 2009 NY Slip Op 29071, Decided on February 20, 2009, Supreme Court, Albany County, Platkin, J.The U.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Take the recent case of Tungsten Partners LLC v Ace Group International LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 32025(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 20, 2017], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich was called upon to decide whether the plaintiff holder of a 4% non-voting profits interest, identified as a “Management Member” in a 65-page operating agreement (plus another 170 pages of schedules and exhibits), was a member of the… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Take the recent case of Tungsten Partners LLC v Ace Group International LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 32025(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 20, 2017], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich was called upon to decide whether the plaintiff holder of a 4% non-voting profits interest, identified as a “Management Member” in a 65-page operating agreement (plus another 170 pages of schedules and exhibits), was a member of the… [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This comes from Delaware Vice Chancellor Glasscock’s opinion in Pogue v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Justice Scalia’s death allows us to reflect on his Indian law record. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:59 pm
 The court's record is not a good one for royalty owners. [read post]