Search for: "Race v. State"
Results 621 - 640
of 9,634
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
The article argues that racial targets remain legally defensible even after the Supreme Court has declared it unconstitutional for colleges and universities to consider race in admissions in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
For that reason, the Court has often stood with the least popular in our society and, since Marbury v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:26 pm
, O Centro, Lukumi, Holt v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 9:20 am
Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:07 am
Supreme Court issued a ruling in Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:30 pm
" United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
Melissa Louis-Williams (Tribal Court Bar Membership) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html Rancheria v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Bush to replace Thurgood Marshall on the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
No Bivens remedy against BOP officials for alleged First Amendment, procedural due process, or race-based discrimination violations Mays v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:57 am
The post Attempt to Block Comment About Critical Race Theory at State Bd. of Ed. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:06 am
Cleveland State Univ. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:24 pm
In the 1987 decision McClesky v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm
After the Supreme Court invalidated the use of race in college admissions in SFFA v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in… [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:00 pm
# # ## # #DECISIONC. v County of Westchester [read post]