Search for: "Randall v. Randall" Results 621 - 640 of 1,044
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm by Conor McEvily
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Daugaard v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:09 am by Lawrence Cunningham
Still others, others, like Randall Thomas and Harwell Wells, look to enhanced corporate law oversight, invoking officer fiduciary duties, recently explicated in Gantler v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:42 am by Marcia Oddi
For publication opinions today (1): In Randall Woodruff, et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:51 am by John Lewis
The New York Times’ article also quoted Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit writing in Randall v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:23 am by Joe Tort
Dukes last Tuesday, there's a good bit of focus from around the web on the individualized hearings aspect of Randall v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:14 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
United States Court of Appeals CIVIL OPINIONS Civil Procedure Class actions Where the named class members have weaker cases than other class members and a conflict of interest, class certification was properly denied. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:12 am by Robert Tanha
If this ruling survives appeal, it it provides a ray of hope for employees who are terminated for cause.As Stikeman Elliot's Randall Boessenkool noted in an article today, "This case is a precedent which should concern employers. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
Layoff, preferred lists and reinstatement of public employees of the State as an employer and employees of its political subdivisions and schoolsSource: The Anatomy of a Layoff by Harvey Randall, Esq., Municipal Lawyer, Summer 2009, Vol. 23, No. 2, published by the New York State Bar Association, One Elk Street, Albany, NY 12207 © 2009 New York State Bar Association. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
Failed to comply with the ruling of the Court of Appeals in Professional, Clerical and Technical Employees Association v Buffalo Board of Education, 90 NY2d 364.In PCTEA v Buffalo, the Court of Appeals held that no strong public policy prohibits an appointing authority from agreeing through collective negotiations to give promotional preference to certain members on an eligible list where a probationary period precedes their permanent appointment. [read post]