Search for: "Richard W. Downs"
Results 621 - 640
of 931
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2011, 6:19 am
The program - called FAST, for Foreign-deployed Advisory Support Team - was created during the George W. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:24 pm
W. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
The only Court of Common Pleas candidate I know well enough to endorse is Richard Haaz in Montgomery County. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:50 am
After Google briefed the State Department, Secretary Clinton issued a statement: “[w]e look to the Chinese government for an explanation. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:50 am
After Google briefed the State Department, Secretary Clinton issued a statement: “[w]e look to the Chinese government for an explanation. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:43 pm
” Photo: Richard Winchell/Flickr [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Richard A. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:43 pm
Under the administration of George W. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 9:31 am
As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
Krieger, Richard K. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:58 am
His name was George W. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:21 pm
George W. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:12 am
Enter Judge Richard Posner. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 9:04 am
The annual rate of executions was actually higher when George W. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 1:36 pm
Bush and Richard Perry) to pay no income tax at all. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:43 am
But I’m not a mentor; I have no time for that crap.When I was clerking (for the Honorable Dorothy W. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:02 am
Can you imagine George W. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:35 pm
It then went down an embankment, through a fence and came to rest in trees. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 7:31 pm
It then went down an embankment, through a fence and came to rest in trees. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:52 am
Dept. of Health and Human Services, although striking down the individual mandate as an exercise of congressional power under the Commerce Clause, purports to reject the activity/inactivity distinction on which many have relied to reach the same conclusion. [read post]