Search for: "Rodriguez v Grant" Results 621 - 640 of 769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors,… [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:40 am by Susan Brenner
Rodriguez-Moreno, 526 U.S. 275 (1999)). [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Because lower courts are bound to follow this Court’s decisions until they are withdrawn or modified, however, Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:09 am by SHG
While the Supreme Court in  Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
§ 2253(c)(2); and (3) whether Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to Mills… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rodriguez, No. 06-2656 Sentencing courts have discretion to consider items such as fast-track disparity in considering requests for variant sentences premised on disagreements with the manner in which the sentencing guidelines operate, however, they are not obligated to deviate from the guidelines based on those items. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 10:30 am by Gene Takagi
Inside the Koch-Backed Effort to Block the Largest Election-Reform Bill in Half a Century via @NewYorkerBrian Galle: Pleased to have been able to help draft this amicus brief on behalf of non-profit scholars in AFPF v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:25 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee did not allege any facts showing that the franchisors had the power to hire or fire, or make personnel decisions, supervise work schedules, determine pay rate, or maintain records of the franchisee’s employees (Rodriguez v. [read post]