Search for: "Rogers "
Results 621 - 640
of 20,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
In the defamation action filed against Roger Clemens by his former trainer, Brian McNamee, the USDC for the Eastern District of New York labeled Roger Clemens’ handling of attorney–client privilege claims as “troubling,” ruled that Clemens’ failure to produce a privilege log waived his privilege claims, and, in any event, rejected Clemens’ privilege assertion over his lawyers’ communications with a public relations firm and Clemens’… [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
In the defamation action filed against Roger Clemens by his former trainer, Brian McNamee, the USDC for the Eastern District of New York labeled Roger Clemens’ handling of attorney–client privilege claims as “troubling,” ruled that Clemens’ failure to produce a privilege log waived his privilege claims, and, in any event, rejected Clemens’ privilege assertion over his lawyers’ communications with a public relations firm and Clemens’… [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 2:01 am
To talk about this second major seditious conspiracy indictment, Lawfare editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes sat down with Lawfare senior editor Roger Parloff, who will be there live blogging it for the site. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 2:01 am
To catch up, Benjamin Wittes sat down with Roger Parloff, who has been covering 1/6 criminal matters for Lawfare. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 2:07 pm
Federal prosecutors amended their prior sentencing memorandum which recommended that Roger Stone receive a sentence of seven to nine years in prison related to his actions related to the investigations into the 2016 presidential election. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 11:13 am
House Democrats reacted furiously to President Trump’s Friday move to commute the prison sentence of political operative Roger Stone -- demanding an investigation and even legislation to stop similar commutations happening again. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 9:09 am
Anticipation by ESAB’s products ALJ Rogers determined that the ‘864 patent was not invalid due to ESAB’s prior art products, primarily due to the fact that ALJ Rogers also determined that ESAB’s products do not infringe the ‘864 patent. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:32 pm
VIP Products LLC with two narrow holdings: (1) the threshold trademark infringement test espoused by the Second Circuit in Rogers v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 7:09 am
Circuit do with the Rogers statement? [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:47 am
Rogers, Jr. issued the public version of Order No. 19 (dated June 6, 2011) in Certain Starter Motors and Alternators (Inv. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 8:31 pm
ROGER SIMON: The Washington Post in Desperation Mode. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 4:06 pm
ROGER L. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 9:58 am
ROGER SIMON WILL BE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE interviewing McCain and Giuliani for Pajamas Media, and he's asking blog readers to suggest questions. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:09 pm
The notice issued by ALJ Rogers released only the conclusions of law in the ID. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:43 am
On August 19th, the District Attorney for the District of Columbia filed a six-count, 19-page, indictment in federal court against Roger Clemens stemming from Clemens’ allegedly-false 2008 statements before Congress about his alleged use of performance-enhancing drugs. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:17 pm
ALJ Rogers also recommended a bond of 100% of the entered value. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
Can Your Rogers Workers Comp Attorney Help if You Refuse the Drug Test? [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 2:15 am
The Roger Clemens perjury trial abruptly ended with the judge declaring a mistrial. [read post]
16 May 2012, 11:46 am
During the jury selection process a prospective juror told the prosecution, judge and defense that he would rather stay home in bed than be a juror on the Roger Clemens Perjury trial case. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:53 pm
Supreme Court Justices suggested to both sides that there might be an easier way out on the facts of this particular case than either party is proposing, but weighed the need to overturn the Second Circuit’s test in Rogers v. [read post]