Search for: "Rogers v. United States" Results 621 - 640 of 1,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
This expansive language would likely chill a wide range of political activity in the United States directed at the Israeli government — activity that is constitutionally protected, regardless whether members of Congress agree with it. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 8:04 pm
No. 109-366, 120 Stat. 2600, validly stripped federal court jurisdiction over habeas corpus petitions filed by foreign citizens imprisoned indefinitely at the United States Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay. 2)Whether Petitioners' habeas corpus petitions, which establish that the United States government has imprisoned Petitioners for over five years, demonstrate unlawful confinement requiring the grant of habeas relief or, at least, a hearing on the merits. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
According to the Illinois Republican, there had been a conspiracy among four “workmen” of the Democratic Party to nationalize slavery in the United States, which had culminated in Dred Scott v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:11 am by Steve Minor
The Benchbook is perhaps the best resource on law and practice in the district courts.In 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Turner v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:51 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States 21-1352Issue: Whether plain-error review governs claims on appeal of error under Rogers v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:07 pm by Alex R. McQuade
” National Security Agency Director Admiral Mike Rogers paid a secret visit to Israel last week to discuss the United States and Israel’s cooperation in cyber defense. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States by an equally divided court, with Justice Anthony Kennedy recused, for this blog. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
United States (whether a district court may direct that a criminal defendant’s sentence run consecutively with a yet-to-be-imposed sentence that the defendant is expected to receive for a state crime). [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am by Amy Howe
United States and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Therefore, the court concluded that Part I was excluded (Para 20).In Roger Shashoua (2017) 14 SCC 722,  the Supreme Court held that where the parties had chosen a venue and there was something else the court has to determine whether these can be interpreted to mean a choice of juridical seat. [read post]