Search for: "S/V Allegiance"
Results 621 - 640
of 804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2012, 9:04 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In Janus, Justice Kagan’s dissent for herself and three others, quoting from the 1984 Arizona v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm
Other, more subtle influences include allegiances created by the process of preparing a witness statement and of coming to court to give evidence for one side in the dispute. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:08 pm
As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:50 am
It is an important win for representative democracy – regardless of where one’s political allegiances lie. [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:58 am
See, Montana v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 5:03 am
(U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:13 pm
Its roots are in the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:29 am
See RCW 29A.56.110, .140; see also Chandler v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 8:01 am
While these cases most often involved public officials, courts also applied the doctrine to private sector employees, particularly those who breached allegiance to their employers by accepting bribes or kickbacks.In 1987, the Supreme Court halted the development of the honest-services doctrine with its decision in McNally v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
That voters approved Proposition 8 denying same-sex couples the right to marry, Judge Walker said, is irrelevant sincefundamental rights may not be submitted to [a] vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.That's a quote from the Supreme Court's 1943 decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:23 am
In the case of Gibbons v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm
Roman Catholic Archbishop v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Read Governing's full report and be sure to check out IJ's commentary over at Forbes.com. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 8:19 pm
Long recalled that the last of those restoration decisions, in the 1962 case of Enochs v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
He quotes Kramer's discussion of the 1958 decision in Cooper v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 8:38 am
Federal law requires civil servants to swear allegiance to the Constitution, and insulates lower-level federal employees from being punished for “refusing to obey an order that would require [them] to violate a law, rule, or regulation. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Smith for their insightful critiques of my book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:46 pm
The key decision is Walz v. [read post]
