Search for: "S. H. V. United States"
Results 621 - 640
of 5,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am
The doctrine may therefore be described as ‘an immunization ratione materiae’ (Thomas H. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of PennsylvaniaOpinion Date: 8/19/09Cite: Perry v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:26 am
District Judge - United States CourthouseMitchell H. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:03 pm
Here is a link to ACCA’s hearing docket listing the issue for review in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:55 am
Vault Cargo Management, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm
H/t: JQB [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:27 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:55 pm
Entrepreneurship Act of 2007 (Introduced in House) HR 1201 IH 110th CONGRESS 1st Session H. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:48 pm
United States * Former President of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund * Counsel to the Warren Commission Mr. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:45 pm
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (which covers Alabama, Florida, and Georgia), held "in order for a fact finding body to ignore a regulation in calculating 'just compensation' for a given piece of property, the landowner must show that the primary purpose of the regulation was to depress the property value of land or that the ordinance was enacted with the… [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:27 pm
The parties' briefs are available here; the brief of the United States is available here. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:24 pm
United States, which relied on an earlier First Circuit decision (United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 12:24 pm
Supreme Court review "whether the prosecution of Seale for a fatal kidnapping that occurred in 1964 but was not indicted under federal law until 2007 is barred by a federal limitations period": Today's order, from which six judges have noted their dissent, issued in the case captioned United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am
Briefly: Ronald Mann analyzes Monday’s opinion in Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:56 pm
"We are confident the United States and the State of Texas will comply with the ICJ's order and stay the August 5th execution of Mr. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:54 pm
Jonathan H. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:06 pm
” Yet the Court rejected the United States’s view that the local litigation clause was “‘a condition on the State’s consent’” meriting de novo scrutiny. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:51 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:54 am
H., 112 LRP 16721 (D. [read post]
