Search for: "SELECT EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, INC." Results 621 - 640 of 1,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
(Chairman Battista and Members Schaumber and Walsh participated) Charges filed by Service Employees Local 285; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(3) and (1). [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 9:01 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you to receive future updates by registering on our Solutions Law Press, Inc. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 1:09 pm by Matthew Moriarty
It offered a lower cost to the government and was selected for award. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
There are only two acceptable justifications for an on-site demand, the Court ruled: (1) “probable cause,” meaning specific evidence of an existing violation of the law; or (2) a neutral selection plan. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
The City Attorney countered that the ABC test is not preempted because it is a generally applicable employment law that does not prohibit the use of independent contractors and therefore does not have an impermissible effect on prices, routes, or services. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:09 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
     The failure to control the selection of the medical provider in those states where the employer controls the medical provider selection. 7. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer has more than 24 years experience advising health plan and employee benefit, insurance, financial services, employer and health industry clients about these and other matters. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 11:45 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer has more than 25 years’ experience advising health plan and employee benefit, insurance, financial services, employer and health industry clients about these and other matters. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Heller took the position that the arbitration clause in Uber’s services agreements is invalid, because it is unconscionable and because it contracts out of mandatory provisions of the Employment Standards Act. [read post]