Search for: "SILVER v. STATE" Results 621 - 640 of 1,284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2014, 6:39 am by emagraken
As stated earlier in this judgment, I did not find Mr. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am by David Pocklington
The Court rejected the State Government’s arguments. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:41 pm
  Via Eugene Volokh, the issue arose in a California case, People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
” In Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald urge the court to grant the pending cert petition in Christie v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, more recent rulings, including Alden v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  The organisation is called NOYB (none of your business)  Surveillance The Register notes the judgment in the case of R (Privacy International) v Secretary of State [2017] EWCA Civ 1868 entitled “UK spy court ruled immune from judicial review – for now”. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
" (Rabbi Silver is also the attorney who filed the complaint in state court--he has been sanctioned in state court.) [read post]
4 May 2023, 11:28 am by Jim Walker
Numerous washing machines for dishes and glassware were observed to be in a state of disrepair. [read post]
22 Feb 2006, 3:56 am
" Perhaps this is an indication that the KSC is backing off or refining its broad defintion of manufacture in State v. [read post]