Search for: "STARK v. UNITED STATES"
Results 621 - 640
of 834
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm
In making the announcement, the FTC said: “The Federal Trade Commission has stopped an Internet scheme that allegedly used bogus “free” product offers that deceived consumers in the United States and other countries and charged them for products and services they did not want or agree to purchase. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
United States, 507 U.S. 234, 242 (1993)). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
United States but in dissent.See, when you dig down into the Third, there's all kinds of resonance. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:13 am
$130,000 cap is increased automatically on January 31, 2012 and on January 31 every two years thereafter by the product of the average annual percentage changes in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) as published by the United States department of labor bureau of labor statistics for the two year period rounded to the nearest one thousand dollars. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 5:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:50 pm
Duncan Stark Blog Editor On Monday, the Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision in the Fourth Amendment case Unites States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The petitioners have pulled together an experienced legal team, including Lord Anthony Gifford, counsel to the landmark case of Dudgeon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
. --- #6 - Haro v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:23 am
Bennet (D-CO) on 12/13/11 Amends INA to promote innovation, investment and research in the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
The Queen on the application of Naik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, United States Tax Court, 137 T.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:33 pm
In the United States, the Second Circuit in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:48 am
Co., 4D10-3978; Stark v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:16 pm
United States of America, Case No. 12.626. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit recently issued a notable decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:05 am
United States of America, Case No. 12.626 (Aug. 17, 2011).While other international cases have situated domestic violence as a human rights violation, Lenahan v. [read post]
