Search for: "STATE V. HARPER"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
Kentucky State Dist. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
The clause states: "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
Harper, a congressional-districting dispute from North Carolina that raises the so-called “Independent State Legislature (ISL)” theory. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 9:22 am
The Split on the Court and the Legacy of Bush v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:55 am
In Wang v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:14 pm
See: New SCOC justice appointment top priority for Harper - Canada.comThe U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:39 pm
Harper, 894 S.E.2d 798, No. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 7:03 am
The Justices sent the case of Harper v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Discussion The basic test for identifying a Fourth Amendment seizure comes from Justice Potter Stewart’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
Harper ARGUED: 12/7/2022 In this case, the Court is considering the ability of North Carolina state lawmakers to have final approval over their own redistricting map. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
Harper v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 12:20 pm
Harper, 96 N.C. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Harper & James, in their tort treatise, said much the same thing: "conformity to the legislative standard. . .may so clearly constitute due care under the circumstances of any given case that the court will decide it does as a matter of law. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 7:52 pm
In my 2003 book, The Supreme Court and Election Law, I discuss the fate of the famous case of Harper v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:30 pm
RBC General Insurance Co. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 4:10 am
Keith Harper Hon. [read post]
Summary dismissal of an action may not be appropriate when an investigation of the facts is required
9 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm
Sussey v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
Justice Stevens apparently took a stand against ID fees in order to remain consistent with Harper v. [read post]