Search for: "STATE v. PATRON"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2009, 6:57 am
Citing People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:00 pm
" But "public transportation" does not include: "(i)intercity passenger rail transportation provided by the entity described in chapter 243 (or a successor to such entity); (ii)intercity bus service; (iii)charter bus service; (iv)school bus service; (v)sightseeing service; (vi)courtesy shuttle service for patrons of one or more specific establishments; or (vii)intra-terminal or intra-facility shuttle services. [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:01 pm
” Saxe, 240 F.3d at 204; see also United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 11:54 am
United States standard). [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
See Reed v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:29 pm
The case, Davis v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 4:54 pm
In Etheridge v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Boggerty v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Mission Bay Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, the Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
This trampoline park, like many hundreds of others that exist throughout the state, requires patrons (or parents of minor patrons) to sign a waiver of liability agreeing not to sue the business if they are hurt. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 9:52 am
According to ABC 13, the shooting occurred “at the V Live Club in southwest Houston. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:25 am
In a split decision, the Mississippi Supreme Court has affirmed the dismissal of Ferguson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:17 pm
By law, Georgia property owners are required to protect all patrons legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:17 pm
By law, Georgia property owners are required to protect all patrons legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:17 am
This included an examination of the Oregon case which led the legislature to adopt the statute, Fulmer v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:07 am
" (cf.Andrews v. [read post]
