Search for: "STATE v. PATRON"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Precedential No. 15: TTAB Refuses Concurrent Use Registration of DELMONICO'S For Restaurant Services
15 Jun 2015, 3:12 am
Southwestern Management, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
” NAACP v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:18 am
More Blog Posts: The Seat Belt Defense in Florida Accident Cases – Jones v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:06 pm
— This commentary was broadcast on WAMC Northeast Report, June 2, 2015. [1] Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
The purpose of a policy that restricted some patrons’ access would be to preserve the collection’s ability to serve scholars. [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:09 am
At bars and nightclubs across the Sunshine State, patrons are subjected nightly to challenges such as “Bladder Buster,” “Sink or Swim” and “Penny ’til you Pee. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm
Learners might be other K-12 teachers; mothers and patrons of library; teens; younger people. [read post]
20 May 2015, 11:56 am
In the case of Limith v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:36 pm
In fact, under the Supreme Court’s 1985 decision in Hamilton Bank v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:52 pm
In Hall v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:36 am
Whether the bathroom is a building itself or is instead a part of a building may be irrelevant under State v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm
When it comes to selective discounts, the California Supreme Court has stated that businesses may offer “reduced rates to all customers on one day each week,” “might offer a discount to any customer who meets a condition which any patron could satisfy,” or might offer “discounts for purchasing commodities in quantity, or for making advance reservations. [read post]
3 May 2015, 12:01 am
The case of Westin Operator, LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 12:06 am
Drivers who want the thrill of getting behind a luxury car or revving the engine on a high-powered vehicle have the option of patronizing one of 50 race tracks located throughout the state – including one in Naples and another in Immokolee. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:41 am
Additional Resources: Carlson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:27 am
’ Patrons . . . turned around to see why [Shivers] was shouting. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 7:03 am
On the other hand, if the employer clearly communicates the no-tipping policy, and customers nonetheless leave tips, the employer may lawfully retain the tips (Meshna v. [read post]
