Search for: "SUPPORT OF K F" Results 621 - 640 of 2,053
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A method of casting an article from metal foam comprising steps in the sequence as follows: a) providing a bath (32) containing said molten metal; b) providing a die (36) having a die cavity (38) in fluid communication with said bath through a tube (39), the die (36) being located above said bath (32); c) establishing a pressure within said bath (32) by passing a pressurizing gas into the bath (32) through a port (40), said pressurization causing the molten metal to be forced up the tube (39) and… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:21 am by Glenn Reynolds
On Wednesday, the “Occupy Oakland” occupiers rampaged through the city, shutting down the nation’s fifth-busiest port, forcing stores to close, terrorizing those residents foolish enough to commit the reactionary crime of “shopping,” destroying ATMs, spraying the Christ the Light Cathedral with the insightful observation “F**k,” etc. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:55 pm by Stanley Radtke
However, there are valid legal arguments to support a 245(a) adjustment for an immediate relative, as the 245(c) & 245(k) bars are waived for immediate relatives. [read post]
Plaintiffs brought a putative class action asserting state law claims against defendants Bay Area Toll Authority (“BATA”), Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District (“GGB”), and Conduent State and Local Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Xerox State & Local Solutions (“Conduent”). [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:55 pm by Stanley Radtke
However, there are valid legal arguments to support a 245(a) adjustment for an immediate relative, as the 245(c) & 245(k) bars are waived for immediate relatives. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 8:22 pm
The other factors contained in Domestic Relations Law 236 Part B include, a) the income and property of the respective parties including marital property distributed; b) the duration of the marriage and the age and health of both parties; c) the present and future earning capacity of both parties; d) the ability of the party seeking maintenance to become self supporting and, if applicable, the period of time and training necessary therefor; e) reduced or lost lifetime earning capacity… [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 3:45 am
Naftalis, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York John K. [read post]
Plaintiffs brought a putative class action asserting state law claims against defendants Bay Area Toll Authority (“BATA”), Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District (“GGB”), and Conduent State and Local Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Xerox State & Local Solutions (“Conduent”). [read post]
Plaintiffs brought a putative class action asserting state law claims against defendants Bay Area Toll Authority (“BATA”), Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District (“GGB”), and Conduent State and Local Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Xerox State & Local Solutions (“Conduent”). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:01 am by Elie Mystal
Maybe he and his daddy can work on some charts or graphs to better illustrate his position.Mark Cuban Files The Ultimate “F**k You” Legal Brief [Deadspin] [read post]
Plaintiffs brought a putative class action asserting state law claims against defendants Bay Area Toll Authority (“BATA”), Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District (“GGB”), and Conduent State and Local Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Xerox State & Local Solutions (“Conduent”). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am by Robert Siegel
., has completed its acquisition of approximately $63.7 billion in residential mortgage servicing rights from Aurora Bank FSB (f/k/a Lehman Brothers Bank) and its wholly owned subsidiary Aurora Loan Services LLC , a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Bancorp Inc. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 6:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A cross moved to: disqualify the F law firm; appoint a receiver; appoint a successor trustee in place of C of the B Family Trust; hold a hearing on whether a guardian ad litem should be appointed for G; strike D's reply in support of her motion to dismiss and strike C's reply in support of her motion to dismiss. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A cross moved to: disqualify the F law firm; appoint a receiver; appoint a successor trustee in place of C of the B Family Trust; hold a hearing on whether a guardian ad litem should be appointed for G; strike D's reply in support of her motion to dismiss and strike C's reply in support of her motion to dismiss. [read post]