Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 621 - 640
of 3,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2021, 8:34 am
In the recent Ohio State University v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 9:18 am
All other terms were stated to be subject to the Sellers’ standard contract, with terms not indicated to be mutually agreed after negotiation. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:59 am
Supreme Court handed down its landmark 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:29 am
--Court: Supreme Court of South CarolinaOpinion Date: 5/24/10Cite: Poynter Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 9:43 am
See Eichorn v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:08 am
Counsel for the defendant adds:ICE: Artifacts seized in US v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 1:59 am
In Whitesell Corp. v. [read post]
On Delfi v Estonia… Is it time to adopt a good-Samaritan style exemption? – Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm
It should be born in mind that in L’Oréal v eBay the CJEU stated 3 things: “The fact that the service provided by the operator of an online marketplace includes the storage of information transmitted to it by its customer-sellers is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that that service falls, in all situations, within the scope of Article 14(1) of Directive 2000/31” (at [113]). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:05 pm
GTE and amplified in CLC v. [read post]
25 Dec 2024, 3:43 am
And States Marine (States Marine International, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 7:03 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
A. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:58 am
The case is DeGennaro v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
As Justice Kagan stated: “This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two words seldom appearing in the same sentence. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Hayrapetyan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:12 am
Wasson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
" The United States District Court for the District of Colorado was faced with just that question in the recently decided Zapien v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The second part of the judgment then focused on whether such violation was justified by the unique qualities of the property in question, the peculiarities of its discovery, or the Italian State’s interest in preserving the integrity of its cultural patrimony. [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:12 am
The parties should also consider the guidance given by Arden LJ in Horvath v Secretary of State for Environment [2007] EWCA Civ 620 at [80]. [read post]
