Search for: "Seven Cases v. United States"
Results 621 - 640
of 4,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2020, 6:17 am
State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:20 pm
Like the N-MCCA’s seven similar opinions to date, the ACCA relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
Hirst v United Kingdom (No2), the ‘original’ prisoner voting case from 2005, was ruled upon first by a Chamber, and then successfully referred to the Grand Chamber, by the United Kingdom, using the procedures described above. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 9:47 pm
The United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:22 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:53 am
A decision in the case is expected by summer. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
Arlington attorneys who handle uninsured and underinsured cases need to be aware of this decision issued by the United States District Court, Houston Division. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm
Another seven decisions were silent on the issue. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 6:53 am
Lyle Denniston of this blog reports that two of the seven petitioning Uighurs in the detention case Kiyemba v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:52 am
The United States Challenges some aspects of these opinions. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 2:05 pm
United States, 556 U.S. 646, 647, 655–56 (2009); United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
And in support of that proposition, Gorsuch cited two Supreme Court cases—Munro v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
And in support of that proposition, Gorsuch cited two Supreme Court cases—Munro v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
Ryan Ashley Brant, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Civil Action No. 1:07-CV-1075 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am
State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:39 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
” There was no deadline in the warrant for completion of the forensic examination and analysis, “nor [does] the Fourth Amendment provide[] for a specific time limit in which a computer may undergo a government forensic examination after it has been seized pursuant to a search warrant” (United States v Hernandez, 183 F Supp 2d 468, 480; see United States v Syphers, 426 F3d 461, 469, cert denied 547 U.S. 1158, 126 S. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:41 am
The United States Supreme Court recently ruled that Florida’s capital sentencing scheme was unconstitutional, in Hurst v. [read post]
