Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 621 - 640
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2010, 9:12 am
Statement from the Scottish Legal Aid Board (pdf) Re: Bank charges - Sharp v Bank of Scotland A spokesperson for the Board stated, “We’re surprised and disappointed that Govan Law Centre (GLC) has publicised this case in its press release, in view of the fact that the Board only received their latest letter yesterday, which raised fresh issues and asked us to consider additional information not previously given to us. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:22 am
In Davis-Miller v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:29 am
18 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
Assn. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 8:07 am
Sharp Electronics Corporation ArrivalStar S.A. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 1:32 pm
., d/b/a CGW Camel Grinding Wheels, USA v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:58 am
Assumption of risk in a work-related activityRios v Town of Colonie, 256 AD2d 900Public safety agencies often sponsor athletic events or authorize members to participate in them. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 12:49 pm
The briefs are each side’s attempt to carry out their view of what the Supreme Court had in mind in its June 12 decision (Boumediene v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 3:21 pm
Sharpe (1012-1015) Brown v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
There were many, including Harris v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
There is not a sharp line. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Prof Uelmen thought the best opinion of the year was Justice Liu's concurrence in People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm
The position had not been altered by the decision of the Supreme Court in A v British Broadcasting Corporation [2014] UKSC 25 (“A v BBC”). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:55 am
Sharp Elecs. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:37 am
Sharp J awarded £65,000 in damages. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am
While the precise words used and the names of the persons to whom they were spoken (and when) must, so far as possible, be set out in the Particulars of Claim if not already contained in the Claim Form (CPR PD 53 para 2.4) the Court confirmed the narrow exception summarised by Sharp J in Freer v Zeb & Ors [2008] EWHC 212 (QB) [31]. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
The AmeriKat passed out on all of herco-existence agreements...A mammoth decision from Mr Justice Norris plopped on the AmeriKat's desk last week in the long-running awaited trade mark co-existence saga of Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme [2016] EWHC 49 (Pat). [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:02 am
The case was tried by Mrs Justice Sharp on 21 to 25 May 2012 and on 21 December 2012 she gave judgment dismissing the defence of justification and awarding the claimant, Mr Miller, damages of £65,000 ([2012] EWHC 3721 (QB)). [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:00 am
As now reported by the local press and in the blogosphere, the Eleventh Circuit in US v. [read post]
