Search for: "Sharp v. State"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
Referring to Axel Springer AG v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
– Sosa v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:12 pm
Student V goes to the office again as Student B is now threatening to kill him daily and throwing sharp objects at him. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 5:56 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 1:56 pm
So good, in fact, that the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently certified that question to the New York Court of Appeals for resolution in a case entitled: Pachter v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:32 am
Shavelson v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 2:59 am
Advocates argue that Congress didn’t really end Indian reservation status for much of the state of Oklahoma even if everyone at the time thought it did [Will Baude on Sharp v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
In New York Times v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm
” In the same way, Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in his dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
United States Rolling Stone magazine has urged judges to overturn the libel verdict against them over fabricated story about University of Virginia rape. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 11:23 am
This stands in sharp contrast to both the district court judge -- Judge Miller -- and the undersigned, who lives within (figurative) spitting distance of the area in question. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:33 am
(Orin Kerr) This morning the Supreme Court handed down Kentucky v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:32 am
That year, he famously wrote in dissent in Callins v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 5:44 pm
Gross v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:57 pm
The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:29 am
State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
[3] Complaint at 29-30, New York v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
