Search for: "Smith v. State of Texas"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am
Smith of the Court of Federal Claims issued his opinion in the Trails Act taking case, Buford v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 7:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:35 am
Today's opinion in Smith v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:39 am
Although the CCA recently remanded a case (Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am
Barnes and Smith v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:09 am
In Dolan Darling, a/k/a Sean Smith v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:30 pm
It was 1990, and James Smith was killed by Texas after 4 of the 9 in Washington had voted to hear his case but there wasn't a fifth vote to keep him alive long enough for that to happen.Richard Glossip this week? [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman’s concurrence in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 9:18 am
In Bucklew v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Dec. 30, 2009) (applying Colorado law); Smith v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:42 am
(The case is Physician Hospitals of America, et al., v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:18 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
’ Smith v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
Guardian Australia has announced the launch of Ben Roberts-Smith v the media, a special 5-episode podcast series about the Ben Roberts-Smith defamation trial. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
A 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:51 pm
The only notable lower court decision is State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:45 am
I need to go through that information and follow up at some point, but it's worth mentioning that one of the names floated in that post, Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz was the metaphorical thumb on the nose of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals who just argued the case for "harmless error" in Smith v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:28 pm
(for the government).United States v. [read post]
