Search for: "South Carolina v. United States"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
As Wikipedia explains, [i]n the United States, removal jurisdiction refers to the right of a defendant to move a lawsuit filed in state court to the federal district court for the federal judicial district in which the state court sits. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Publicly funded schools first emerged in the United States in the 1780s. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:46 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 8:44 am
In his late thirties, he became a professor at the University of South Carolina where he taught political science. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 9:00 pm
”The United States Supreme Court that in making this complex determination the law can only take jurors so far. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 9:44 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:43 am
White v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:15 am
White v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:29 am
Part III analyzes the emergence of the right to present a defense that a third party committed the crime and concludes with a discussion of the Supreme Court's recent decision in South Carolina v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 11:27 am
Three years later, “a South Carolina jury award[ed] the largest judgment ever against a hate group in Macedonia v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:56 am
South Carolina five times before finally denying review today. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 2:56 am
America’s Best Franchising, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:05 am
Hinson, Executive Director United States Consumer Product Safety DivisionWashington, D.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
Such a ruling would allow the University . . ., as assignee, to gain access to all patent applications filed by the defendants in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and to take such actions in the Patent Office as might be needed to protect its rights. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 1:58 pm
In this case, the hybrid tennis court was not “used” in the United States - it was “used” in Spain and that use was broadcast in the United States.You can watch some of the match here:Decision affirmedMarcinkowska v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:41 am
Under Remmer v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:16 pm
Our South Carolina attorneys have a vast amount of experience in both state and federal courts and handle criminal cases all over the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm
In South Carolina v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
Calhoun of South Carolina; and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts. [read post]
