Search for: "Spalding " Results 621 - 640 of 1,095
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 10:53 am by David Ingram
Another former partner said the review would typically have involved examining the potential impact on King & Spalding’s lobbying practice. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:45 am by Orin Kerr
Clement’s group at King & Spalding struck me as one example.I think Clement’s departure is a bit unfortunate because it suggests that even such an ideological mix can be unstable. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:23 am by Jenna Greene
Hikma, which was founded in Amman, Jordan in 1978 was represented by Brian Meiners of King & Spalding. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:21 am by John Steele
 In the wake of the HRC's campaign to pressure King & Spalding to drop its client (i.e., the House of Representatives), we're now seeing some public statements criticizing, expressly or implicitly, HRC's behavior. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) My post last week on the ACLU led to this e-mail from Harvey Silverglate, which he kindly let me post on the blog. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:51 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Indeed, under ABA Model Rule 1.4, King & Spalding could have to disclose such information to Congress. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:18 am
By Mike Dorf In explaining why his law firm was not going to defend the constitutionality of DOMA, after having agreed with House Republicans a week earlier to take the case, King & Spalding partner Robert Hays said: "In reviewing this assignment further, I determined that the process used for vetting this engagement was inadequate. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 3:08 am by Seth Leventhal
The Atlanta-based law firm of King & Spalding (K&S) seems to have alienated everyone this week on the left and on the right of the political spectrum, having taken on as a client — then firing —  the Republican-led U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:43 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
Angered over Clement's decision, the Human Rights Campaign launched a campaign against King & Spalding, seeking to punish the firm because one of its partners dared represent a controversial client. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:14 pm by Richard Painter
Second, King & Spalding first agreed to represent a committee of the United States House of Representatives in defending the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) against lawsuits claiming it is unconstitutional, and then King & Spalding suddenly dropped the client, under pressure from interest groups on the other side of the DOMA debate and perhaps pressure from another client. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:49 pm by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) I hadn’t thought to say anything about the King and Spalding withdrawal of representation on DOMA, although I agree broadly with what other Conspirators have said. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:13 pm by David Ingram
Clement signed a contract this month on behalf of King & Spalding to represent the House’s leadership in cases about the federal Defense of Marriage Act, and he’s planning to continue the work at Bancroft. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:40 pm by Ashby Jones
  I don’t what happened between him and King & Spalding, I’m not casting blame. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm by Elie Mystal
* Everybody wants to take credit for pushing King & Spalding off of DOMA defense. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:18 pm by Mike Scarcella
” Holder said he did not know what happened between Clement and King & Spalding, the Atlanta-based firm that yesterday asked to withdraw from lawsuits about the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]