Search for: "Spencer v. State"
Results 621 - 640
of 836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 9:39 am
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit heard arguments in Shuman v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:05 am
Supreme Court's Lewis v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am
This was in the case of Spencer v United Kingdom (1998) 25 EHRR CD 105) which concerned publication in tabloid newspapers of photographs and information about Countess Spencer attending a clinic for the treatment of an eating disorder and for alcoholism. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:46 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ahmed, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1949 (29 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Raggett v Society of Jesus Trust of 1929 for Roman Catholic Purposes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1002 (27 August 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) HM Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer Plc [2010] EWHC 2215 (Ch) (27 August 2010) High Court (Family Division) Re P [2010] EWHC 1592 (Fam) (13 May 2010) A Local Authority v A & Anor… [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
The Ninth Circuit issued three opinions in Spencer v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 4:02 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:33 am
The decision is Pace v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:23 am
See Spencer v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:04 am
Herbert Spencer’s Social Statics”; or, more to the point, “general propositions do not decide concrete cases. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
Blake State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 1 – Corinne Tobeck State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 2 – Uncontested State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 1 – Mary Helen Roberts State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 2 – Marko Liias State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 1 – Steve Robinson State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 2 – Sam Hunt / Chris Reykdal State Representative Dist. 23, Pos. 1 – Sherry… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 4:17 am
State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:29 am
Supreme Court’s June 24, 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:05 am
In today’s case (Zale v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:13 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:43 am
The WHD Interpretation states that the FMLA does not require an employee who intends to assume the responsibilities of a parent to prove that he or she provides both day-to-day care and financial support to be found to stand in loco parentis to a child. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
A state court said no. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
(Mass.) 1999); Kim v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:21 pm
Welcome Harvey V. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:24 pm
Do we really want to exempt Puerto Rico from Martin v. [read post]
