Search for: "State Farm Mutual Insurance Company"
Results 621 - 640
of 752
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2009, 2:27 am
My posts on that subject has generated a tremendous amount of page views and commentary, some of which is from those involved in the exams and/or litigation:State Farm Hit With Civil RICO Claim Over Sham Medical Exams (2/4/8)Allstate Slammed With RICO Charge Over Sham Medical Exams (3/2/08)A Doctor, Sued In Insurance Company RICO Suit, Responds To The Charge(3/3/08)State Farm Hit With New RICO Suit, Brought as Class Action by Patient for Sham… [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 11:03 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 331 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003), as the standard: In reaching its decision, the Foltz court concluded that a party seeking a protective order bears the burden of showing good cause for each particular document it seeks to protect. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:39 am
State Farm Awarded $15.4 Million in RICO Suit Against Doctors
The Legal Intelligencer
In a civil RICO suit that accused three doctors of operating a fraud mill that sharply inflated medical care costs for car accident victims, a federal jury last week awarded more than $15.4 million to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 12:49 pm
Most large insurance companies, including AAA, State Farm, Farm Bureau, and Allstate, WOULD NOT abide by Granholm's request. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:11 am
The case, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 12:50 am
The appeals court upheld a jury's decision that State Farm owed the couple about $200,000 for wind damage. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 12:01 pm
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 4:12 am
State Farm Mutual Auto. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:22 am
According to the ATRA website, here are some of the members: The American Medical Association, State Farm Insurance, Johnson & Johnson, Medical Mutual Insurance, Pfizer, Physician Insurers Association of America, Pharmaceutical Reasearch & Manufacturers of America, American Trucking Associations, and Wyeth, among others. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
The Penningtons had four drivers in their family, all of whom were insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
The Penningtons had four drivers in their family, all of whom were insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
In addition to the claims of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s insureds, the approved class sought to hold Liberty Mutual Insurance Company liable for claims of insureds of other Liberty Mutual sister companies. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
In addition to the claims of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s insureds, the approved class sought to hold Liberty Mutual Insurance Company liable for claims of insureds of other Liberty Mutual sister companies. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:20 pm
This discovery following its quantitative analysis became the basis for the Court's ultimate holding.In addition, the Court noted a 1:1 ratio was consistent with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 3:29 pm
See, e.g., Merced Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:16 am
Once investments begin to contract, as through a run on the company, the house of cards quickly collapses. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
State Farm Mutual, No. 20693, Order (Portsmouth Sep. 14, 1995); Schoonmaker v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:13 am
The companies are: State Farm, Allstate, Fire Insurance Exchange, Nationwide, The Travelers, United Services Automobile Association, Liberty Mutual, The Chubb Corporation and American Family Mutual. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm
Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), that the in-person purchase requirement in portions of Kentucky’s statutory scheme discriminated against interstate commerce by limiting the ability of out-of-state small farm wineries to sell and ship wine to Kentucky consumers. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 5:35 pm
Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), that the in-person purchase requirement in portions of Kentucky’s statutory scheme discriminated against interstate commerce by limiting the ability of out-of-state small farm wineries to sell and ship wine to Kentucky consumers. [read post]
