Search for: "State v. A. H." Results 621 - 640 of 10,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Advance Notice Still Required Post-Booker for Upward Variance/Departure
29 Dec 2006, 11:59 am
The 2-1 published decision can be found at: United States v. [read post]
Sixth Circuit Blog - http://circuit6.blogspot.com/
Mikveh OK In Area Zoned For Places of Worship
24 Oct 2015, 7:28 pm by Howard Friedman
" [Thanks to Steven H, Sholk for the lead.] [read post]
Religion Clause - http://religionclause.blogspot.com/
Establishment Clause Challenge To New York's Carve Out of Standards For Yeshivas
24 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
[Thanks to Steven H. [read post]
Religion Clause - http://religionclause.blogspot.com/
Tax Court Rejects Minister's Attempt To Shield Income From Taxes
4 Sep 2014, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
In Cortes v. [read post]
Religion Clause - http://religionclause.blogspot.com/
Fourth Circuit rejects retaliation claim in case involving Secret Service gun contract
5 Jan 2011, 2:36 am by Ben Vernia
Dist. v. [read post]
False Claims Counsel - http://www.falseclaimscounsel.com/wordpress
Case Study: Gallardo v. Marstiller, 596 U.S. ___ (2022)
13 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm by ttetting
 § 1396a(a)(25)(H). [read post]
Herrling Clark Law Firm Blog - https://herrlingclark.com/blog/
Untitled
15 Jan 2015, 10:29 am by Jon Sands
United States v. [read post]
Ninth Circuit Blog - http://circuit9.blogspot.com/
Samuels on America's Most Important Piracy Case
20 Mar 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Joel H. [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
State answerbrief in Schwab
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
Lethal Injection - http://lethal-injection-florida.blogspot.com/
State answerbrief in Schwab
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
Lethal Injection - http://lethal-injection-florida.blogspot.com/
Matthiesen, "Reproduction Reconceived: Family Making and the Limits of Choice After Roe v. Wade"
20 Feb 2022, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
(H/t: New Books Network)-- Karen Tani [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
First Circuit weighs in on Rule 32(h) issue soon to be addressed by SCOTUS
21 Feb 2008, 2:27 pm
The circuit courts being divided,1 the Supreme Court is now likely to decide the issue, United States v. [read post]
Sentencing Law and Policy - http://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/
Thoughts on Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB
28 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
(Jonathan H. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://volokh.com
[Jonathan H. Adler] WV v. EPA: Some Answers about Major Questions (But Not All the Answers We Need)
3 Aug 2022, 8:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Tom makes the case for this approach in his new book on Chevron, The Chevron Doctrine: Its Rise and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Ray v. Blair First Addressed Faithless Electors
3 Feb 2020, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
In Ray v. [read post]
Constitutional Law Reporter - https://constitutionallawreporter.com/
New Auto Insurance Class Actions Against GEICO and Progressive Focus on State Law Compliance Issues
17 Apr 2012, 2:27 pm by Wystan M. Ackerman
Code § 3901-1-54(H)(7). [read post]
Insurance Class Actions Insider - http://www.insuranceclassactions.com/
Futrell v. Payday California: Court of Appeal Affirms Finding that Payroll Processing Company Did Not Employ Plaintiff
20 Dec 2010, 9:15 am by Steven G. Pearl
Futrell v. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 1 today (and 6 NFP)
5 Jul 2007, 11:12 am
Wendy H. [read post]
The Indiana Law Blog - http://indianalawblog.com/
By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court holds that a federal prisoner who has already filed (and exhausted) a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 can’t file another postconviction motion to raise a claim of legal innocence based on an intervening statutory-interpretation-decision of  the Supreme Court.  Section 2255(h) bars second or successive 2255 motions based on non-constitutional claims; and the “saving clause” of § 2255(e) doesn’t authorize a petition for a “writ of habeas corpus,” under § 2241, for claims barred by § 2255(h). Jones v. Hendrix, Sup. Ct.  21-857, __U.S.. __  (June 22, 2023).
27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Darrell Fields
Jones v. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
OPINIONS – September 17, 2019
18 Sep 2019, 7:42 am by scanner1
H. [read post]
State Law Library of Montana - https://mtlawlibrary.wordpress.com/