Search for: "State v. Atkins"
Results 621 - 640
of 671
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
State of Minnesota
• US v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 4:28 pm
At the time, the ILB wrote:The ILB was very surprised today when it attempted to check the docket in the recent case of Guardianship of Patrick Atkins; Brett Conrad v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 6:56 am
In 2004, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 4:20 am
Today the Star is giving front-page coverage to a Court of Appeals decision from June 27th, the case of the Guardianship of Patrick Atkins; Brett Conrad v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 3:52 am
Gaines v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:20 am
Nothing in her remarks evidenced any sympathy with shareholders and their substantive rights under state law.The irony in the positions taken by Casey and Atkins is that the access proposal in fact permits private ordering and respects state law. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:52 pm
The ILB has posted a number of entries on "secret dockets" and "sealed dockets" in other states. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
The case, known as Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:34 am
The district court held that although the state court had not complied with either state law or the requirements imposed by the Court's 1986 decision in Ford v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 12:50 am
A global list of events commemorating the day is available here, and at ImmigrationProf Blog there's a call for petition signatures....2002 (5 years ago today), in Atkins v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 7:18 am
Texas is one of the states in which no legislation has been passed to bring the state into compliance with the 2002 Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 6:12 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:34 pm
in Atkins v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:41 am
. - Five years after the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:21 am
Wallace concurred, stating though that a modified categorical approach should be used.US v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:47 am
California Supreme Court on Atkins v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:10 am
I recently noted here that states have developed, and struggled with, a wide array of "ways to enforce the constitutional restriction" on executing mentally retarded offenders as required by the Supreme Court's 2002 Atkins decision. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 9:59 pm
More federalism in administering Atkins When the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
When the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
