Search for: "State v. Ball" Results 621 - 640 of 2,342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
However, a forward lateral moves the ball forward in such a way that it is against the rules. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
However, a forward lateral moves the ball forward in such a way that it is against the rules. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 5:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(See an earlier podcast segment on the topic.)Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Front-end and back-end solutions.Death and TexasUS Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ayestas v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 3:10 am by Walter Olson
“Baseball rule” win for Yankees at appeals court: “Court Rules Against Fan in New York State Foul-Ball Case” [Zach Spedden, Ballpark Digest] More on the downfall of the $417 million baby powder verdict against Johnson & Johnson [Steven Boranian/Drug & Device Law, Robert H. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 8:56 am by Bill Marler
Of the viruses, only the common cold is reported more often than a norovirus infection—also referred to as viral gastroenteritis. [2] Nature has created an ingenious bug in norovirus. [3] The round blue ball structure of norovirus is actually a protein surrounding the virus’s genetic material. [4]  The virus attaches to the outside of cells lining the intestine, and then transfers its genetic material into those cells. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 7:13 am by Charlie Warner
Ball State University, “an employee is a ‘supervisor’ under Title VII only if he is ‘empowered by the employer to take tangible employment actions against the victim. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 7:13 am by Charlie Warner
Ball State University, “an employee is a ‘supervisor’ under Title VII only if he is ‘empowered by the employer to take tangible employment actions against the victim. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:35 pm by Christopher Wilkinson
The Bouncing Ball in the Courts The Second Circuit Court of Appeals en banc heard oral arguments on September 26, in Zarda v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm by Joseph Fishkin
   Why not, above all, in Bush v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 9:29 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
But keep your eye on the ball because the California Supreme Court will be making the final call on the de minimis doctrine and whether or how it applies in the state. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 9:29 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
But keep your eye on the ball because the California Supreme Court will be making the final call on the de minimis doctrine and whether or how it applies in the state. [read post]