Search for: "State v. Brake" Results 621 - 640 of 972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2012, 10:06 am by Michelle Yeary
Warner Electric Brake & Clutch Co, 605 N.E.2d 1032 (Ill. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
The appellate panel’s response in State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm by Nathaniel Baca
(b) “Peace officer” means any undersheriff, deputy sheriff other than one appointed with authority only to receive and serve summons and civil process, police officer, Colorado state patrol officer, town marshal, or investigator for a district attorney or the attorney general who is engaged in full-time employment by the state, a city, city and county, town, judicial district, or county within this state. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm by Nathaniel Baca
(b) “Peace officer” means any undersheriff, deputy sheriff other than one appointed with authority only to receive and serve summons and civil process, police officer, Colorado state patrol officer, town marshal, or investigator for a district attorney or the attorney general who is engaged in full-time employment by the state, a city, city and county, town, judicial district, or county within this state. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 10:37 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is better explained by the Tyler Court of Appeals in a 1998, case styled, Huynh v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am by Susan Brenner
  These two counts charged Laiwala with violating California Penal Code § 115(a), which provides as follows:Every person who knowingly procures or offers any false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in any public office within this state, which instrument, if genuine, might be filed, registered, or recorded under any law of this state or of the United States, is guilty of a felony.People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
The Frye standard states that an expert opinion "must be shown to be generally accepted as reliable. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 6:15 am
Cutshaw, Attorney The Indiana Supreme Court recently issued an interesting decision in Clark v. [read post]