Search for: "State v. C. D. H." Results 621 - 640 of 2,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
Green & Joseph Oluwole, Hein v. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm by Frodnesor
" Even if it were treated as surplusage, though, the court held that it should not give meaning to surplusage if doing so would be demonstrably at odds with the legislative intent, citing Lamie v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm by admin
 If you are asking this question you have probably done some research already and know that each state has its own exemptions. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Raincoast Conservation Foundation v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:57 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The former president, however, has recently stated that he has “nothing to do” with Project 2025 and disagrees with unspecified parts of it; furthermore, an emailed press statement from his campaign “greatly welcome[d]” Project 2025’s “demise. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
"  Publicly distributed in turn meant that the communication “[c]an be received by 50,000 or more persons in a State where a primary election . . . is being held within 30 days. [read post]