Search for: "State v. Christie" Results 621 - 640 of 974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2009, 9:26 am
Watch Tribal Rights in Education Nationally and in Your State Melody McCoy | Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, Colorado Watch Tribal Tax Planning for Construction and Other Projects After Barona v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 6:32 am by courtney
Court” Concordia Journal (17 January 2008), online: http://cjournal.concordia.ca/archives/20080117/ concordias_restitution_efforts_lead_to_landmark_ruling_in_us_court.php; United States Court of Appeals, Vineberg v Bissonnette 08-1136 November 19 2008; Max Stern Estate: 10th Painting Reclaimed” (5 March 2013) Concordia News Stories, online: http://www.concordia.ca/content/concordia/en/news/stories/2013/03/05/ max-stern-estate-10th-painting-reclaimed.html;… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:44 am by Susan Brenner
Christie, 624 F.3d 558, 573–574(II)(C) (U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
On December 29, 2022, the Second Circuit issued its highly anticipated opinion on remand in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
However, the Court of Appeals in Corpus Christi held that a federal court injunction is not binding on State courts. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Christie: June Rodgers's son was tragically murdered, allegedly by a man who days before had been granted pretrial release by a New Jersey state court. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:20 am
This issue, the Registrar observed, was not yet decided by the Singapore courts, although it was previously considered in another IPOS decision (Christie Manson & Woods Limited v Chritrs Auction Pte. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:00 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
-Corpus Christi 2007, orig. proceeding [mand. denied]) (holding that an oral motion to enforce a settlement agreement was sufficient because "[a]s long as the motion recites the terms of the agreement, states that the other party has revoked its previously stated consent to the agreement, and requests the trial court to grant relief, the motion is sufficient"); Bayway Servs., Inc. v. [read post]