Search for: "State v. Close"
Results 621 - 640
of 31,631
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
These limiting features in the majority's fine opinion persuade me that it has not locked the names of litigants behind closed doors to the disservice of that transparency that alone earns us public confidence and trust. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Tornetta et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Tornetta et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Department of State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:56 am
Freed, and United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
Damage to the plaintiffs’ property by the armed forces of the Russian Federation constitutes an exception to the state’s judicial immunity, in line with customary international law, which, according to the Court, is confirmed in Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts and in practice of the International Court of Justice (North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) Case) and practice of the European Court of… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
It's quite another to say it's closed. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:15 am
Palkon v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:19 am
The Court of Appeals says qualified immunity cannot attach at this early stage of the case.The case is Mehaylo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The new rules would also close a longstanding loophole by requiring foreign companies with investments across member states, including in real estate, to declare their beneficial owners. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:40 am
"] From Manookian v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:07 pm
The implications can be said to be national in scope as individual states step forward with their own interpretations of Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
SCOTUS Repeated Relisting of a Case on the Meaning of Race Neutrality--and a Plug for my new Article
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Thompson, 403 U.S. 217 (1971), in which the Court infamously allowed Jackson, Mississippi to close all of its public swimming pools in the face of a desegregation order. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Minister of Agriculture v Bluelilliesbush Dairy Farming (270/07) [2008] ZASCA 60 (29 May 2008), the Supreme Court of Appeal considered compensation following an outbreak of bovine tuberculosis where 7 000 cattle were slaughtered by the State in terms of the Act. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 5:29 pm
Turning to removal, Justice Livote acknowledged that officer removal in the close corporation context may defeat reasonable investment-backed expectations because “‘[i]n his capacity as an officer or employee’” of the entity, a shareholder often “‘looks to his salary for the principal return on his capital investment, because earnings of a close corporation, as is well known, are distributed in major part in salaries, bonuses and retirement… [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
Nonetheless, Cases like Terre Neuve Sarl v Yewdale Ltd [2020] and Etihad Airways PJSC v Flother [2020] reveal complexities in ascertaining commercial expectations and business efficacy. [read post]
