Search for: "State v. Country" Results 621 - 640 of 24,155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
 must be interpreted as meaning that the holder of an intellectual property right over goods sold to a person residing in the territory of a Member State through an online sales website in a non-member country enjoys the protection afforded to that holder by that regulation at the time when those goods enter the territory of that Member State merely by virtue of the acquisition of those goods. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 8:09 pm by David Super
       The effort to call an Article V convention is not about aspirations for a better country. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Maggie Blackhawk (University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School) has posted "On Power & the Law: McGirt v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
NIPNLG, Aug. 29, 2024 " IMPORTANT UPDATE: PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PRELIMINARILY APPROVED J.O.P. v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 am by Elizabeth Whatcott
General Assembly, Eleventh Emergency Special Session, 4th Plenary Meeting, Representative of Bosnia-Herzegovina Sven Alkalaj compares his country’s genocide to the situation in Ukraine: “What can be the message of the ambassador of Bosnia-Herzegovina, the country that suffered aggression, the brutal occupation for almost 4 years facing the arms trade embargo, where genocide was committed three decades ago, and almost half of the population was brutally killed,… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
After reviewing the claim construction briefs and stating that the briefs "well written and helpful," the district court, Judge Posner, stated that he had a concern regarding the proposed claim constructions. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 10:49 am by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The opinions of the United States Supreme Court are the law of the land and generally must be followed by all states. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm by Timothy Edgar
Today’s decision by the European Court of Justice on safe harbor – Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:54 am by Cyrus Farivar
” As Vice Motherboard first reported, the remarks came from the November 1 hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]