Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals"
Results 621 - 640
of 105,615
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Accountability, Inc. v Cuomo, 167 AD3d 1406, 1409 [3d Dept 2018], appeal dismissed 33 NY3d 993 [2019], lv dismissed & denied 34 NY3d 961 [2019]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:00 am
In AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 9:05 pm
The U.S. appeals court decision in Obasi Inv. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:03 pm
In Popa v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:27 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 8:56 am
State v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:59 am
The Decision of the Court of Appeals Judge E. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order that likely ends one of the most closely-watched climate change lawsuits in recent American legal history: Juliana v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
The Court revisited the scope of the residual clause in Southwest Airlines Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces), Judge Emin Toro (United States Tax Court). [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Green’s petition for the court to exercise original jurisdiction under C.A.R. 21, thus bypassing the Court of Appeals. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
Supreme Court, April 12, 2024, Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
In 1931, the Supreme Court in Near v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:16 pm
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In WA Interpreters v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 10:10 am
The order in Sandoval v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:40 am
This appeal would not have been possible without the incredible advocacy of Marcos Danielson, LW’23, before the juvenile court when he was a clinic student. [read post]