Search for: "State v. Crims"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2014, 8:06 am
Crim. [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Judge denies warrant application because he thinks the government doesn’t need a warrant
24 Mar 2014, 3:02 am
” United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 7:11 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:28 am
Crim. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
Crim. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 12:25 pm
Crim. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:40 am
” [10] See U.S. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Similarly, United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:15 pm
Wong, 3 Misc. 3d 274, 277 (Crim, Ct., NY County 2004). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
Crim. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage in that action too… [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 7:42 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:12 am
R v Unah [2011] EWCA Crim 1837 [2012] 1 WLR 505 and R v Y(A) [2010] EWCA Crim 762 [2010] 1 WLR 2644The Magistrates did not appear to have approached the question of whether there was a reasonable basis for Ms G’s belief:They do not set out the facts which say what the reasonable basis for that belief was and there were a number of factors which they would have required to address, including the structure of the Tribunal’s decision, flat by flat,… [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 10:12 am
R v Unah [2011] EWCA Crim 1837 [2012] 1 WLR 505 and R v Y(A) [2010] EWCA Crim 762 [2010] 1 WLR 2644The Magistrates did not appear to have approached the question of whether there was a reasonable basis for Ms G’s belief:They do not set out the facts which say what the reasonable basis for that belief was and there were a number of factors which they would have required to address, including the structure of the Tribunal’s decision, flat by flat,… [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm
Germain Katanga (Int’l Crim. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:01 am
Crim. [read post]
