Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 621 - 640
of 3,674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2007, 12:23 am
" State v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am
Davis v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849, 855 (Tex. 2002). [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:50 am
” Certified Conflict Case Davis v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
Davis and McDonough v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 1:42 pm
See Davis v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:00 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am
He lamented the uncertainty created by the US Supreme Court's odd ruling in US v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourtroom 18, 6th Floor333 Constitution Avenue N.W.Washington D.C. 20001For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-statesFor the motion for preliminary injunction:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states-motion-preliminary-injunction-and Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org … [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:19 am
Davis v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 12:15 am
Davis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:49 am
The Michigan Supreme Court dismissed one application for leave to appeal based on the parties’ stipulation, granted five motions for brief filing extensions and vacated its 2009 opinion in People v Bryant in accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:44 am
Jefferson Davis Parish Board of Review, No. 2020-C000200. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:44 am
Jefferson Davis Parish Board of Review, No. 2020-C000200. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:10 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:01 am
[1] Arnold v Britton & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 902 (22 July 2013), para 45 [2] Ibid, para 50 [3] Ibid, para 57 [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
For example, in the seminal case of United States v. [read post]