Search for: "State v. Dodd"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2017, 9:15 am
While the English v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 10:44 am
In SEC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:33 am
AFSCME and several state pension funds, including the nation's largest, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), sent letters to the SEC in mid-November urging Cox to let the AFSCME v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:20 am
The justices are scheduled to hear oral argument in Liu’s case on March 3, 2020 (Liu v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:23 am
(Business Roundtable and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm
The justices declined to take up the case of Peruta v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:31 pm
Superior Court.2013In American Express Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Nevertheless, the Policy Statement will be published in the Federal Register, and comments may be submitted until July 3, 2023.[5] BACKGROUND The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)[6] makes it unlawful for any covered person or service provider to engage in any unfair, deceptive, or abusive act or practice.[7] The Dodd-Frank Act also provides the CFPB with rulemaking authority to define and prevent unfair,… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:29 am
In filings submitted last week, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the Bureau) both opposed and moved for summary judgment in PayPal, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
Endogenous Legal Traditions and Economic Outcomes Posted by Carmine Guerriero, University of Amsterdam, on Friday, April 22, 2016 Tags: Diversity, Efficiency, Financial Regulation, Globalization, International governance, Labor markets, Legal systems,Market efficiency, Social policies, Stakeholders Dieckman v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
" discussing the FCC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 9:08 am
Wildhirt v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 12:35 pm
There is very little case law interpreting this provision, other than the general rule from Schnell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:28 pm
Bruning v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:19 pm
Specifically, Dodd-Frank provided that the NBA preempts a state consumer financial law if the state law “significantly interferes with the exercise by the national bank of its powers. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:38 pm
Dodd also weighs in here on the Court's opinion in Wilkie. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:15 am
" In this order, the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia found that - in AFLAC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:28 pm
But there is more to the story than NAM v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:19 pm
One case that addresses the definition is Lopez v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:19 pm
One case that addresses the definition is Lopez v. [read post]
