Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 621 - 640 of 9,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2007, 12:46 pm
I’m pretty sure that Judge Bea didn’t intend to give me a chuckle in the first paragraph of his opinion in Collins v. [read post]
District Court for the District of Maryland issued an opinion and an order enjoining the implementation of President Trump’s latest travel ban. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:18 am by Miriam Seifter
Yesterday, the Supreme Court announced its decision — but no opinion — in Washington v. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 6:18 am by Patricia Salkin
Colorado River abstention was found to be appropriate in a case decided in April by the District Court for the District of New Mexico. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:12 am by Derek T. Muller
How individual district court judges handle these requests—how quickly, and with what kinds of appeals—remains deeply uncertain.That said, I don’t think RNC v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Abbott, where the Court affirmed a three-judge district court’s rejection of the claim that Texas violated the “one-person, one-vote” principle by equalizing the number of people—rather than the number of voting-age citizens—in each district.Second, notwithstanding the importance of the “one-person, one-vote” doctrinal revolution in the 1960s—the first time the Court said the Constitution requires… [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:44 am by William Sinclair
District Court for the District of Maryland recently considered what types of plaintiffs may initiate such litigation, and excluded out-of-state persons that merely “test” faraway properties for ADA compliance. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:42 pm
Some commentators are criticizing the Obama administration's position in the case: District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:59 pm
The Supreme Court disagreed overruling both the district court and the appellate court on both these counts stating that arbitration is indeed a judicial process but that no judicial process is required for the claim of malicious abuse of process. [read post]