Search for: "State v. Harm" Results 621 - 640 of 25,831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am by Ivan Horodyskyy
Damage to the plaintiffs’ property by the armed forces of the Russian Federation constitutes an exception to the state’s judicial immunity, in line with customary international law, which, according to the Court, is confirmed in Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts and in practice of the International Court of Justice (North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands) Case) and practice of the European Court of… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The most obvious class of examples, as I discussed on Monday and as I explain at greater length in the article, consists of so-called "percentage" plans by which various states guarantee admission to a state university to students graduating in a specified top percentage of their respective high school classes.For example, in his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:38 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
With no statutory definition of assault, the appeals court considered the common law definition set forth in State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Maggie Mills
  The International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on State Responsibility, which articulate most authoritatively the rules governing the invocation of countermeasures, are clear that injured States may put in place countermeasures against the States that harmed them. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
This action resulted in the suspension of K&K’s Amazon listings, causing immediate harm to its business. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by Andrew Koppelman
  The language of privacy and autonomy was deployed to enable the religious to wield state authority and harm their students. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there was a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:07 am by Keaoleboga Molefe
In Minister of Agriculture v Bluelilliesbush Dairy Farming (270/07) [2008] ZASCA 60 (29 May 2008), the Supreme Court of Appeal considered compensation following an outbreak of bovine tuberculosis where 7 000 cattle were slaughtered by the State in terms of the Act. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 am by Orin S. Kerr
But I gather we are accustomed to the idea that it's the established risk of harm, not actual harm, that is the plausible reason to withdraw the license. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 5:29 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Dvir complained that there was “no evidence” in the record to show that if he “continues as an officer of the corporation he will in any way continue to harm” the business. [read post]